nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to your offender and also the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Because the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Typically, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including All those in very clear violation of established case law) on the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, and also the case will not be appealed, the decision will stand.
As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner should pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal has not nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then search for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to think about all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification website for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in inserting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based over the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. As a result, this petition must be allowed Read more
Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a law that is based on precedents, that will be the judicial decisions from previous cases, relatively than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. If your appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days for that department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are guided through the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
ten. Based about the findings on the inquiry committee, this petition is just not thought of maintainable and is also therefore liable to generally be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is additionally important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could possibly be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for turning into entitled for being regarded as for promotion to a higher quality, of course, will not be without logic because the officer who is in the beginning inducted into a particular post needs to serve on the claimed post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and also to serve the public inside of a befitting way.
Criminal cases In the common regulation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil regulation systems, common law systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.